Trello vs Figma: Which Should You Choose in 2026?
Choosing between Trello and Figma? We analyzed both tools using our proprietary 100-point scoring methodology. Here's what we found.
🏆 Quick Verdict
Winner: Trello
Trello edges out Figma with a higher overall score.
📊 Score Comparison
Trello
Figma
📈 Detailed Score Breakdown
| Category | Trello | Figma | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value/Price (30pts) | 28/30 | 25/30 | Trello |
| Competitive Moat (25pts) | 21/25 | 23/25 | Figma |
| Transparency (20pts) | 19/20 | 18/20 | Trello |
| UI/UX (15pts) | 14/15 | 14/15 | Tie |
| Tech Maturity (10pts) | 9/10 | 8/10 | Trello |
✅ Pros & Cons
Trello
Strengths
- Highly accessible entry point with generous free tier
- Extensive third-party integration ecosystem
- Robust cross-platform availability
- Advanced automation capabilities included in all plans
Weaknesses
- Critical productivity views restricted to high-cost tiers
- Hidden costs for enterprise-grade security
- AI features are gated behind Premium subscriptions
Figma
Strengths
- Figma provides a free Starter plan suitable for personal projects and basic design needs.
- The product offers a comprehensive suite of integrated design and collaboration tools.
- Flexible tiered pricing with distinct seat types (Collab, Dev, Full) caters to various user roles and team structures.
- AI credits are included across various plans, enhancing user productivity.
- Robust enterprise-level features are available, including custom team workspaces, APIs, and SCIM seat management.
Weaknesses
- Full pricing details and specific terms for Organization and Enterprise plans are not publicly listed and require contacting sales.
- Several advanced features, such as Multi-brand design systems and In-app Library Analytics, are restricted to higher-tier plans.
- Some new products and features, like Figma Buzz and Figma Sites, are currently in Beta, which may imply evolving functionality or stability.
- A prominent cookie consent banner appears on initial page load, which can be intrusive to the user experience.
🏰 Competitive Moat Analysis
Trello
Trello's moat is primarily driven by its massive user base and the 'Power-Up' marketplace, which creates significant switching costs through workflow integration. As an Atlassian product, it benefits from deep integration with Jira and Confluence, making it a default choice for technical and non-technical cross-functional teams.
Figma
Figma possesses a very strong competitive moat primarily built on network effects and high switching costs. Its real-time collaborative nature makes it indispensable for design teams, fostering a shared ecosystem where moving to another tool would disrupt established workflows and require significant re-training and migration of assets. The comprehensive suite of integrated tools (Figma Design, FigJam, Dev Mode, Slides, Draw, Buzz, Sites, Make) creates a powerful, all-in-one solution that reduces the need for multiple disparate tools. The strong community and extensive template/UI kit libraries further enhance its value proposition and lock-in. Enterprise-level features like design system APIs and SCIM management solidify its position within large organizations, making it deeply embedded in their operational infrastructure.
🎯 Our Recommendation
Choose Trello if: Trello offers an industry-leading value proposition with a highly generous free tier and competitive scaling for enterprises, backed by the robust Atlassian ecosystem....
Choose Figma if: Figma offers a highly collaborative and comprehensive design ecosystem with strong value across individual, small team, and enterprise segments, supported by clear pricing and a modern user experience...
Our Methodology
This audit uses Onyx Protocol's standardized evaluation methodology, scoring products across 5 categories: Value/Price (30pts), Competitive Moat (25pts), Transparency (20pts), UI/UX (15pts), and Technical Maturity (10pts). Each category is assessed based on publicly available information.
- This analysis is based on publicly available information at time of audit
- Pricing and features are subject to change
- Individual use cases may have different requirements
- Not a substitute for hands-on evaluation or free trial
Last updated: January 03, 2026. Scores may change as products evolve.